The Ballad of the Sad Cafe by Carson McCullers
22 Wednesday Sep 2021
Posted Reading Reflections
in22 Wednesday Sep 2021
Posted Reading Reflections
in16 Thursday Sep 2021
Posted Reading Reflections
inAmy Clampitt (1920 – 1994)
Amy Clampitt was brought up in New Providence, Iowa. She wrote poetry in high school, but then turned to writing fiction instead. She graduated from Grinnell College, and from that time on lived mainly in New York City. To support herself, she worked as a secretary at the Oxford University Press, a reference librarian at the Audubon Society, and a freelance editor.
When she was in her forties, she returned to writing poetry. Her first poem was published by The New Yorker in 1978. In 1983, at the age of sixty-three, she published her first full-length collection, The Kingfisher. She died in September 1994. Her obituary described her work as dense, ornate and allusive.
Ted
This is a flowing, visual, almost cinematic poem. The use of enjambment slowly moves the reader down to the next line, and the next, echoing the dancer’s movement which is compared to feathery floating snowflakes. The dancers appear to be a metaphor for the conversation between the two onlookers. It is an obscure poem where time and memory appear to be suspended by the movement [‘All process and no arrival’] which the poet feels is a happier state.
Dancers Exercising. By Amy Clampitt
Frame within frame, the evolving conversation
is dancelike, as though two could play
at improvising snowflakes’
six-feather-vaned evanescence,
no two ever alike. All process
and no arrival: the happier we are,
the less there is for memory to take hold of,
or—memory being so largely a predilection
for the exceptional—come to a halt
in front of. But finding, one evening
on a street not quite familiar,
inside a gated
November-sodden garden, a building
of uncertain provenance,
peering into whose vestibule we were
arrested—a frame within a frame,
a lozenge of impeccable clarity—
by the reflection, no, not
of our two selves, but of
dancers exercising in a mirror,
at the center
of that clarity, what we saw
was not stillness
but movement: the perfection
of memory consisting, it would seem,
in the never-to-be-completed.
We saw them mirroring themselves,
never guessing the vestibule
that defined them, frame within frame,
contained two other mirrors.
Christine A
Gerard Manley Hopkins is cited as a major influence. Clampitt can be over-elaborate in her choice of vocabulary leaving the reader reaching for their dictionary but that does not detract from the beauty of the poem which first attracted me to her work. “Syrinx”. The opening lines take us straight to the matter in hand – how birdsong is produced in a most memorable way.
Explanatory notes on the Poetry Foundation website define the word “syrinx” as not only the mythical reed-pipes of Pan, but also the branched tubules in a bird’s throat with vibratory openings that create the possibility for birdsong.
Syrinx. By Amy Clampitt
Like the foghorn that’s all lung,
the wind chime that’s all percussion,
like the wind itself, that’s merely air
in a terrible fret, without so much
as a finger to articulate
what ails it, the aeolian
syrinx, that reed
in the throat of a bird,
when it comes to the shaping of
what we call consonants, is
too imprecise for consensus
about what it even seems to
be saying: is it o-ka-lee
or con-ka-ree, is it really jug jug,
is it cuckoo for that matter?–
much less whether a bird’s call
means anything in
particular, or at all.
Syntax comes last, there can be
no doubt of it: came last,
can be thought of (is
thought of by some) as a
higher form of expression:
is, in extremity, first to
be jettisoned: as the diva
onstage, all soaring
pectoral breathwork,
takes off, pure vowel
breaking free of the dry,
the merely fricative
husk of the particular, rises
past saying anything, any
more than the wind in
the trees, waves breaking,
or Homer’s gibbering
Thespesiae iache:
those last-chance vestiges
above the threshold, the all-
but dispossessed of breath.
08 Wednesday Sep 2021
Posted Reading Reflections
inThe Maltese Falcon is a detective story by American writer Dashiell Hammett and was first published in 1930. This was Ted’s choice for our September novel.
Ted:
The author worked for a time as a private detective for Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency and his experiences laid the foundation for his writing career. From the late 1920’s he became the master of detective fiction in America. This novel was adapted for film four times. The third and best-known version, The Maltese Falcon [1941] starring Humphrey Bogart and Mary Astor, is considered a film noir classic.
Private eye Sam Spade and his partner Miles Archer are approached by the beautiful Miss Wonderly to follow a man, Floyd Thursby, who allegedly ran off with her younger sister. The two accept the assignment because the money is good, but Spade suspects that her innocent demeanour is a façade and that she looks like trouble. That night detective Tom Polhaus informs Spade that Archer has been shot and killed whilst tailing Thursby. Later that night Thursby is also killed and Spade becomes a suspect. What follows is a complex plot involving several unsavoury characters like arch-villain Casper Gutman and creepy Joel Cairo, more murders, and all in the pursuit of a priceless statuette of a bird, the Maltese Falcon.
I liked the direct, understated, hardboiled writing style. The killer is finally revealed to be master liar and trickster Brigid O’Shaughnessy [ Miss Wonderly] who has been lying to Spade and everyone else to cover up her true scheme. Despite being lovers, Spade is quite ruthless about doing the right thing and hands her over to the police with all the incriminating evidence. There are some great one-liners: ‘I hope to Christ they don’t hang you, precious, by that sweet neck.’ He slid his hands up to caress her throat. ‘If they hang you I will always remember you!’
********
Christine A:
I’m glad I’ve read The Maltese Falcon having heard it so often referred to as a classic. (How much of its reputation is bound up with the John Huston film starring Humphrey Bogart as the protagonist is difficult to say.) This is the first piece of Hardboiled fiction I have attempted and I found it heavy going. In 2021, it’s sobering to think that such a gratuitously violent, misogynistic book has a following. The blunt unvarnished style suits the content but makes for an effortful read. Maybe this is a case for watching a film of the book rather than reading the book itself (what a subversive thought!).
********